Day 10: The City Counsel Meeting
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. City of Houston.
Culminating Project
OVERVIEW
Yesterday, teams worked on their culminating project: a report sharing what they have learned about a Texas ecoregion/ecosystem and the inherited and acquired traits of the plants that live there, including how changes in environmental conditions that have taken place (and could continue to take place) in the ecoregion/ecosystem may have contributed to the plants acquiring new traits. Today, teams will present their reports at a simulated city council meeting.
MATERIALS NEEDED
Each team needs:
- the report they have written
SETUP
- Ideally, the tables or desks should be set up in a semicircle so that teams can see each other. This configuration will help engage all learners in the discussion. The teacher should also sit in the semicircle.
- Decide the order in which the teams will present.
- Each presenting team will stand in front of the class and be prepared to answer any questions.
PRESENTATIONS
- Welcome the children and any guests to the “city council meeting.”
- Invite each team to present their reports. (Depending on time allotted, you might have each team read their report aloud or choose part of their report to read aloud.)
- Allow time for each presenting team to answer questions from other learners. You might also pose questions or ask group to elaborate.
DEBRIEFING
- After all presentations are complete, ask learners what patterns they saw across the information presented by the teams.
- Invite learners into the discussion with these questions:
-
- What did you notice about the relationship between the environmental characteristic of different ecoregions/ecosystems and the inherited and acquired traits of plants that live there?
- What similarities or differences did you notice across the presentations?
- Ask learners to talk about the scientific process in this unit, what they enjoyed, and what they will continue to do.
- Congratulate learners on the work they did over the duration of the unit!
EVALUATE
- Were the reports well organized?
- Did the evidence given reasonably support the team’s investigation claim(s)?
- Did teams consider their “nonexpert” audience when writing their reports?